LSE Student Life

I thought I would follow up my post earlier in the month about school in the UK with this piece on student life. For better or worse, I think non-academic student life plays a bigger role here because of the way academics are structured.  I’m dividing it up into three categories: Extracurriculars, Athletics, and Social

Extracurriculars

Extracurriculars play a huge part of student life outside the classroom at LSE. Clubs here are called “Societies” and all official societies operate under the umbrella of the LSE Student Union (more on this later). This being LSE, the most popular societies have something to do with business (Finance Society is the largest) or culture (curiously no “American Society”). There are also a few political societies and a few odd balls like the Hummus Society. Arts here aren’t too big. I know we have a drama society, chorale, orchestra, and some dance groups, but no band or a capella groups as far as I know.

For the most part, I have to say I really like the Society system here. Yes there are a lot of redundancies (Chinese Student Scholars Association and Chinese Society?) and a lot of E-boards are definitely inflated to give more people resume fodder, but they actually get big things done. LSE Entrepreneurs, which I have chosen to get involved in, puts on a business plan competition called Pitch It! and I specifically am part of an Apprentice-style competition called EPIC. Other societies like the Investment Society and China Development Society put on their own conferences in fancy conference rooms with high profile speakers. The Finance Society regularly brings in bankers and traders from “The City” to talk about their jobs. The aforementioned Chinese Student Scholars Association has its own rec basketball league.

Of course, all this is possible thanks in large part to the ability for LSE Societies to obtain outside sponsorships. As a result, groups like the Finance Society have massive budgets into the hundreds of thousands of pounds thanks to lucrative sponsorships from big corporations and investment banks. It allows them to put on lavish events and hand out tons of freebies at Student Activities Day (although they still charge a nominal £1 dues). Some of them can even sponsor other societies! Granted, this emphasis on fundraising might help explain why the business-related Societies seem to have the largest presence, but I think overall this is a good example of the market bringing in much more resources than a measly “student activities fee” ever could. It makes the Society experience much richer than any club I’ve joined at BC.

Athletics

This is LSE we’re talking about and it is in London so athletics naturally would not be the LSE’s strong point. There definitely is no such thing as going to Alumni or Conte in your Superfan shirt on the weekend, but there is a variety of competitive and intramural sports available to everyone via the Athletics Union. Facilities are usually located a fair distance from the school and people don’t take it nearly as seriously since scholarships aren’t at stake, but teams do compete against other schools (apparently LSE and Kings even have a BC-BU-esque rivalry). In a sense it’s more like high school sports in the US with A teams and B teams (the equivalent of varsity and JV). Personally I joined the Tennis Society with the intention of playing for fun on free weekends, but right now it looks doubtful if I’ll ever hit the courts here (long story). In general, I think people join the AU more for the social aspect. LSE’s AU is notorious for its crazy parties and antics on Wednesday nights.

Social

London has one of the top social scenes of any city in the world. Since the drinking age here is 18, everyone is legal and as a result clubs and pubs are a big draw. Since those living in Central London generally have small flats, you don’t see many American style house parties. The real strange thing for me (aside from freshmen drinking in the hallways without RAs) is that most of the kids here go out during the week and stay in on weekends. For the most part, I think this would be inconceivable at BC (puts thirsty Thursday to shame), but in this context it actually makes some sense. With the way classes are structured, there’s not much written work you have to prepare each night. Moreover, most LSE classes are later in the day. Lastly, a lot of clubs have discount “student nights” during the week, which is a great incentive for cash strapped students. I for the most part have stuck to a relatively conservative American schedule, but if these British kids can do it their way, good for them.

Student Union (and The Beaver)

LSE’s equivalent of UGBC is called the LSE Student Union and when they say “Union,” they literally mean union (as in AFL-CIO union). Every student is automatically enrolled (thankfully there are no dues) and can therefore attend general meetings, participate in debates, and enjoy the “protection” of the Union. As a legitimate union, it also means it carries a lot more weight and power than UGBC. The LSE Student Union has successfully pushed for 24 hour library hours during finals and is currently working on re-sits for exams. In addition, the Union oversees the finances of other societies and operates its own cafe, shop, and bar on campus.

Overall though, I’m not too big of a fan of the Union. For one, I think it’s a little too militant in portraying things as an “us-against-them” struggle with the administration. In general, I think the people who run the political side of things are the self-important, egotistical, smooth talking type who will eventually become politicians. For example, Palestine is a big issue here (on both sides) and the SU regularly passes resolutions on Palestine. Come on people, what is this, model UN? (for PHS debaters, a bill demanding world peace suddenly seems plausible). I think their attitude turns the general student body off and it shows as attendance at the general meetings lately have reportedly been abysmal.

Lastly, I have to put in a little bit about The Beaver, the weekly student newspaper here. Again, I have to say I’m not a fan. I read it occasionally to get a feel of a side of the university I may not be exposed to otherwise, but I am disappointed by the quality of journalism. First of all, the appearance is kind of childish with way too many colors on the headings and such, although appearance is never a strong suit for UK newspapers in my opinion (I’m looking at you FT pink). The news articles are generally short with a minutes-like report of what happened. There’s no analysis or discussion of the larger picture. There are plenty of editorials though with all sorts of crazy views. Then there’s some ridiculously trashy stuff like a recount of the AU’s Wednesday night antics or a “Body of the Week” feature.  Overall, not a very polished or professional newspaper. I’ll stick with my Heights.

We don’t need no education…

Hi all, it’s been a while. Winter break is coming to a close and classes will be starting soon, so I thought I would take this opportunity to do my post on the UK education system. (I’m going to focus on higher ed because I really don’t understand the primary and secondary education system. All I know is that it involves something with A-levels, O.W.L.s, and public schools that are really private schools.)

To sum it up, there are some pretty big differences and I like the American system better. Undergraduate degrees at LSE are 3 years and masters are 1. We’re technically on a trimester system with Michaelmas in the fall, Lent in the spring, and Summer in well…late spring. However, you take your finals in Summer term so it’s almost more of a semester system. One of the great benefits of this setup for study abroad students is that we get a 5 week long spring break between Lent and Summer terms plus you get several reading/review weeks before taking finals in Lent term. The downside of all this is you go 10 weeks straight with no breaks during term time and you get out later in the summer which is tricky for juniors because of internships.

Another major difference is we take four year long classes instead of the four or five per semester at BC. In addition, I’m in class about half as much as at BC. Each course typically has an hour long lecture where you listen to a professor talk for an hour and then you go to an hour long class when you go over homework, expand on concepts, and discuss issues from the week’s lecture. I’m not a big fan of this setup. Personally I’ve gotten used to the extra face time at BC to reinforce concepts and absorb knowledge in more manageable morsels. I also think the separation of lecture and discussion destroys some of the continuity you get with the instruction. The classes are taught by grad student TAs, so quality varies greatly. Professors typically aren’t the friendly, helpful types you get at BC. You’ll be lucky if you get a chance to talk to them at all. I don’t know, maybe I’ve been spoiled by BC.

I also don’t like the grading system. They fudge it a little for study abroad students, but for everyone else almost nothing matters except for the final exam. That means there is little incentive to do any work during the year and not surprisingly few people do. Then come spring break and Summer term, it’s mad cramming session that from what I understand puts Bapst cramming to shame. I don’t think this is a really effective way to learn. Most of the finals are selective types where you get a choice of questions to answer so theoretically you could ace a course without ever learning certain concepts. The incentives are really screwed up. You’d think the London School of Economics would have a better understanding of these things.

Of course, not to be completely negative, the British system does give students more independence and responsibility for their work. It also gives students more opportunities to pursue specific topics that interest them. It also gives them more time to focus on internships and extracurriculars (I’ll do another post on student life later). I also like the specialization (although they seem to love the liberal arts education) especially in contrast to the sometimes overwhelming double whammy of the A&S and CSOM cores at BC. That being said, I still prefer the American university system to the British. Now for the curious:

Course I’m taking at LSE

Corporate Finance, Investments, and Financial Markets: Third year finance class that’s half investments, half corporate finance. Pretty typical subject matter, but the investment portion at least has been more theoretical than what most American universities would offer.

Business and Economic Performance since 1945: Britain in International Context: Possibly my most interesting class at LSE. We basically look at why British economic growth has been disappointing since WWII. The school has one of the first economic history departments in the world and I have to say I’ve learned a lot, not only about British economic history but recent British history and society as well. Also I have my best professor at LSE for this class. He kind of reminds me of a British economic history version of John Gallaugher.

Organizational Theory and Behaviour: Those who have taken OB at BC will probably know the story. Interesting class on how to organize and motivate people in the workplace, but a lot of it seems really soft and subjective. Having taken AP Psych in high school, this feels a lot like psychology lite.

Structure of International Society: Your intro to international relations course. Had I planned my schedule better and not taken language courses for fun freshman and sophomore year, I may have worked this into an international studies minor, but as it is it’s purely for fun. IR is interesting especially given the diversity of viewpoints at LSE (discussion on the war in Iraq is going to be great). Again, it seems a little subjective to me with most lectures ending in “we don’t know” and too much of the subject still uses a Cold War mindset.

Tech in Britain

So last time I talked about how I’ve jumped on the podcast and netbook bandwagon since coming to London. In part two of my series on tech in the UK, I’m going to talk a little about my observations of the tech industry and tech usage in London. In general, I would say consumer adoption of new technologies is at about the same level if not slightly higher than in the U.S. However, institutional or systematic adoption seems to lag behind the States. Here are some examples to illustrate my point:

The mobile industry here is quite possibly better than in the U.S. I can’t speak to 3G coverage here because I don’t have a smartphone, but regular call services are definitely superior to the U.S. First off, there are more carriers than back home so the industry is much more competitive. The major carriers are Vodafone (parent of Verizon), O2 and Orange, but there are also second tier carriers like T-Mobile and 3 and smaller players like Lyca Mobile. Unlike the duopoly that AT&T and Verizon have in the U.S., these carriers all have about equal market share so they all have very strong networks and consumer-friendly deals. I’m currently on a recurring 30 day contract with Vodafone (who, no surprise, have the best coverage here) with 100 minutes and 500 texts per month for just £10 a month ($16). What’s better is that you don’t pay to receive incoming calls and texts. Therefore, I essentially get 200 minutes and 1,000 texts assuming my incoming and outcoming usage are about equal. There also seems to be a greater selection of fancy phones here outside of the iPhone and Blackberry (although most study abroad students just get a cheap basic phone). The iPhone is going to be on multiple carriers soon (Vodafone and Orange are introducing it early next year) and

Android phones seem to be more popular (although that could change with the Droid). Overall, the competitive landscape of the mobile industry here seems to be a big gain for consumers.

Other technologies are on a similar level to the U.S. as well. At LSE, I see an equal amount of PCs and Macs, although Macs are not officially supported by IT services here. TV is a little different because they don’t really have cable here. Everything is either broadcast (which you need to pay a TV license for) or satellite (Sky box, which gets you lots of American shows and even some American sports). There are some things that they don’t have here, namely the Kindle. It’s also annoying that I can’t access things like Hulu or ESPN360 because of broadcast restrictions. A small aside here: I think going subscription is a horrible mistake for Hulu. If my situation right now is any indication, there’s always a way around if content isn’t easily accessible through legal channels. Any sensible businessman would realize that some revenue is better than no revenue.

One interesting site they do have here that’s not in the U.S. is Spotify. I first heard about it on This Week in Tech; it’s basically a legal, ad-supported peer to peer streaming service. It lets you listen to as many songs as you want on your computer and mobile app and then links you to traditional music stores if you want to purchase the song. Right now, its invite only for free use or you can pay for the premium subscription. Unfortunately, Spotify seems just as bad as Google Wave when it comes to giving out invites, as I still have not received mine for either. This thing sounds more innovative from a technical aspect than a consumer aspect. From what I can tell it sounds a lot like any other streaming service.

I also want to comment briefly on Internet here especially in light of the net neutrality debate that’s been going on recently in Congress. Publicly, there are plenty of wi-fi hotspots around London and the ethernet connections (at least at LSE) aren’t bad. However, I don’t think the UK has net neutrality. LSE’s website, for example, actually states that it prioritizes school related content over “social” sites (although Facebook has worked fine). I’m not sure how exactly they differentiate this or how much this is actually implemented, but I’ve definitely experienced more problems with Internet here. For example, for the first few weeks here I couldn’t get CNN or ESPN videos to buffer at any reasonable rate. Then magically they started working fine. Of course this could be because these are American sites and it has nothing to do with net neutrality. However, I’m still a little skeptical of this whole situation.

The disparity in institutional tech adoption is much wider. LSE definitely weaves less tech into its infrastructure than BC. For example, LSE doesn’t have an equivalent of Eaglebucks or any type of electronic currency. Everything in the dining halls is paid for in cash. Also, if you thought class registration at BC was bad, its a lot worse here. Some universities, such as King’s, don’t even have electronic course selection. LSE does let you add/drop online, but I’m pretty sure the actual adding/dropping is done manually by a person because it only updates about once a day. There’s no Laundryview here (although they have a version of it for computers on campus) and the machines are the old models we had at BC which were replaced this year.

There are a few things they do well here as a school. The library has these cool self-checkout kiosks where you can just pop the book on a scanner and it automatically senses what the book is and checks it out for you. The NHS also uses a touchscreen self check-in system for appointments, thus freeing up receptionists to do other things. Believe it or not they actually do some things efficiently. And like a lot of countries I’ve seen around Europe, the credit and debit cards here have a little chip in them so you can stick it into the machine instead of swiping it. I’m not really sure what the advantage of this is because any time you save from the physical motion is negated by the few seconds you have to keep the card in to verify it, but it looks kind of cool.

I’m sure more observations and comments will come up over the next few months. I will also be doing a post on entrepreneurship here so keep an eye out for that. I’ll try to get back to the strictly travel/London related posts too, but I honestly haven’t been anywhere the past few weeks so there’s not much to say.